| Hostnames |
li1082-201.members.linode.com feedback.sweet.io |
| Domains | linode.com sweet.io |
| Cloud Provider | Linode |
| Cloud Region | us-ca |
| Country | United States |
| City | Fremont |
| Organization | Linode |
| ISP | Akamai Connected Cloud |
| ASN | AS63949 |
| Operating System | Ubuntu |
Note: the device may not be impacted by all of these issues. The vulnerabilities are implied based on the software and version.
| CVE-2023-44487 | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2021-3618 | 5.8ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the TCP/IP layer can redirect traffic from one subdomain to another, resulting in a valid TLS session. This breaks the authentication of TLS and cross-protocol attacks may be possible where the behavior of one protocol service may compromise the other at the application layer. |
| CVE-2021-23017 | 6.8A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory overwrite, resulting in worker process crash or potential other impact. |
| CVE-2019-9516 | 6.8Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. |
| CVE-2019-9513 | 7.8Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. |
| CVE-2019-9511 | 7.8Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. |
| CVE-2019-20372 | 4.3NGINX before 1.17.7, with certain error_page configurations, allows HTTP request smuggling, as demonstrated by the ability of an attacker to read unauthorized web pages in environments where NGINX is being fronted by a load balancer. |
367035927 | 2024-04-26T17:18:23.23134080 / tcp
-1232306054 | 2024-05-18T18:19:34.48137081 / tcp
367035927 | 2024-05-19T05:17:18.528403443 / tcp
-1790471025 | 2024-05-16T17:53:10.5036448000 / tcp
-723936098 | 2024-05-04T08:16:36.3421388001 / tcp
-1080725621 | 2024-05-13T23:34:30.8766148888 / tcp